Zulu Rondovel Reimagined
Concept Owner / Company: Roger Bennett-Architect
Website: N/A
Contact: rogerbennettarchitect@gmail.com
To implement and build from the existence of what is already available to the homeless. To make use of what has been started and make it more acceptable by everyone, including the homeless. The concept isn’t for architects and politicians. It is to legitimize the way homelessness is evolving. It is a nudge to further evolve what has been built from what most of us throw away. The physical approach is similar to the Zulu rondovel(“round house”). Instead of mud,grass, and stucco, curved metal composite panels or MCP’s with screened images of their environment. All of us live with these images and call them blight. Why not take the curse away?
At least to start with. The curved MCP’s demonstrated include shelters for 1-2 persons and up to 8-9 people with the clustered units. The walls can be arranged according to the physical opportunities on hand: empty lots,disused spaces,under overpasses,and in the left-over spaces of urban areas. The walls can sit on plastic, temporary road material that rests on drainage gravel. With a radius of 5′-7″ each half circle can stack easily for trucking. Sanitary facilities can be incorporated or be close by.
- Quoted Total Cost: $13,000
- Planned Occupancy (1 person/bed): 8 beds
- Estimated Cost Per Bed: $1,625
- Quote’s Total Interior Square Footage: 404 sqft
- Quote Includes # Units: 8 units
- Used for Shelter Before: Not used as shelter yet
- Readiness: Conceptual Idea Only
- In Stock / Ready to Ship Today: No
- Manufacturer Identified and Available: N/A
- Setup Speed: 17 days
- Setup Difficulty: Moderate (prefab assembly)
- % Built Onsite: 50% – Some Prefab Parts Assembled On-Site/Flat Pack
- Portability: Portable (after major disassembly)
- Intended Use of Shelter: Medium Term (1-10 years)
Design
| Design Advantages | Simplicity- Buildable in 3 days with 2 men |
| Manufacturer Identified | No |
| Used for shelter in the U.S.? | No |
| Prior use examples | not used before |
| Prior use comments | not used before |
| Building experience comments | |
| Intended use cases | |
| R-value (insulation) | 11-20 |
| Risk Category | N/A – Temporary Use |
| Roof Load (PSF) | 30 |
| Indoor Clearance Height (ft) | 10 |
| Waterproof? | Yes |
| Professional Engineer Stamp? | minimal |
| Conforms to ICC’s Temporary Structure and Uses Code | n/a |
| Other Structural / Safety Comments | Simple structure. The curved walls resist seismic. |
| Sustainability / Green Building Certifications? | All recyclable |
| Materials Used / Made of: | |
| Disassembly / Assembly Comments: | 2 men during one day |
| Ideal Mounting Surfaces | Other |
| Anchoring Process | May not be necessary. Otherwise two or three spiral stakes into the ground |
Budget
| Item | Cost ($) | Notes |
| Materials | $3,000 | |
| Labor | $1,200 | |
| Delivery | $300 | |
| $ | ||
| $ | ||
| $ | ||
| Budget Total | $4,500 | |
| Total Per Bed | $563 | |
| Total Per Unit | $563 | |
| Add-on Items | ||
| Check all items that are not included in your quote (i.e. would need to be quoted by outside party) | Lighting, Electrical distribution, HVAC, Toilet / Washrooms | |
| List outside vendors needed to execute (including any architects and engineers) | MCP fabrication Silk screen Assemblers | |
| Possible Delivery Method(s) | Regular-sized trailer | |
Timing
| Design (days) | 10 |
| Production (days) | 5 |
| Site Prep (days) | 1 |
| Delivery (days) | 1 |
| Total (days) | 17 |
| Amount in Inventory (#) | minimal |
| Production Capacity | 15 units per truck |
| Production Location | Los Angeles |